Skip to main content

Finance and AccountingPKM348

Resource Mobilization in the Public Sector

Public institutions across Africa face increasing demands to provide infrastructure, healthcare, education, social protection, digital services and climate-resilient development. At the same time, governments are experiencing constrained budgets, rising debt-servicing costs, narrow tax bases, declining or unpredictable donor funding, informality, illicit financial flows and limited institutional capacity.

Overview

Resource mobilisation in the public sector must therefore go beyond fundraising. It requires a systematic approach to:

  • Increasing domestic tax and non-tax revenue;
  • Improving collection efficiency and compliance;
  • Leveraging public assets;
  • Mobilising private-sector capital;
  • Accessing grants, concessional finance and climate funds;
  • Developing bankable projects;
  • Building strategic partnerships;
  • Improving expenditure efficiency;
  • Strengthening accountability and public trust; and
  • Ensuring that mobilization efforts are sustainable, equitable and aligned with national priorities. The programme treats resource mobilisation as an institution-wide leadership and management responsibility, not merely the function of the finance department. The latest continental data confirms the importance of a diversified approach. Across the African countries covered by the OECD/AUC/ATAF dataset, tax revenue performance varies significantly, while non-tax revenue remains comparatively volatile. This reinforces the need to combine taxation, non-tax revenue, partnerships, grants, asset optimisation and expenditure efficiency rather than depending on one source.

Programme objectives

By the end of the programme, participants should be able to:

  1. 01To strengthen the capacity of public-sector leaders and practitioners to identify, design, secure, manage and sustain diverse sources of financial and non- financial resources for effective public service delivery
  2. 02Explain the strategic role of resource mobilization in public-sector development
  3. 03Diagnose institutional funding gaps and resource mobilization constraints
  4. 04Map existing and potential sources of public-sector resources
  5. 05develop an evidence-based resource mobilisation strategy
  6. 06Identify opportunities for improving domestic tax and non-tax revenue
  7. 07Assess public assets and determine options for generating sustainable value from them
  8. 08Prepare credible, bankable and fundable programmes and projects
  9. 09Mobilize private-sector participation through appropriate partnership structures
  10. 10Identify and access donor, concessional and climate-finance opportunities
  11. 11Develop compelling concept notes, proposals and investment cases
  12. 12Engage development partners, investors, citizens and other stakeholders
  13. 13Strengthen governance, transparency and accountability around mobilized resources
  14. 14Manage financial, legal, political, social and implementation risks
  15. 15develop measurable resource mobilisation targets and performance indicators
  16. 16Produce a practical institutional resource mobilisation action plan

Who should attend

  • Permanent Secretaries, Directors-General and senior public officials
  • Officials from ministries of finance, planning and economic development
  • Officials responsible for budgeting and public financial management
  • Local government and municipal finance officials
  • Public-sector project managers
  • Heads of strategy, planning and resource mobilisation
  • Public investment and PPP unit officials
  • Grant, donor and development-cooperation officers
  • Officials from state-owned enterprises and public agencies
  • Infrastructure and sector ministry officials
  • Procurement, legal, audit and risk-management professionals

Programme outline

10 modules · 411 topics

  1. 01Foundations of Public-Sector Resource Mobilisation24 topics · includes a case scenario

    To establish a common understanding of resource mobilisation and its relationship to public policy, national development and service delivery.

    • Meaning and scope of resource mobilisation;
    • Resource mobilisation versus fundraising;
    • Financial and non-financial resources;
    • Domestic, external, public and private sources;
    • The public-sector resource mobilisation ecosystem;
    • Relationship between policy priorities, planning, budgeting and mobilisation;
    • Fiscal space and the financing gap;
    • Revenue mobilisation versus expenditure efficiency;
    • Principles of sustainable, equitable and responsible financing;
    • The political economy of public-sector resource mobilisation;
    • Why technically sound mobilisation initiatives may fail politically;
    • Effects of debt, informality, economic shocks and climate change;
    • Aligning resource mobilisation with national development plans, Agenda 2063 and the Sustainable Development Goals;
    • The “resource mobilisation cycle”:
    • Diagnose;
    • Prioritise;
    • Package;
    • Identify sources;
    • Engage;
    • Negotiate;
    • Secure;
    • Implement;
    • Account; and
    • Sustain.

    Case scenario

    Practical exercise Participants construct a “resource dependency profile” showing: • Current funding sources; • Percentage contribution from each source; • Reliability; • Restrictions; • Cost; • Risk; and • Future potential. Case study: African public revenue trends Participants examine differences in tax and non-tax revenue performance across African countries and assess why some countries have more resilient revenue structures than others. The case demonstrates the danger of relying heavily on commodities, grants or a narrow group of taxpayers.

  2. 02Institutional Resource Mobilisation Diagnostic and Strategy31 topics · includes a case scenario

    To enable public institutions to assess their financing situation and develop a coherent resource mobilisation strategy.

    • Connecting institutional mandates to financing requirements;
    • Translating strategic plans into costed priorities;
    • Funding-gap analysis;
    • Historical revenue and expenditure analysis;
    • Identifying unfunded and underfunded mandates;
    • Resource mobilisation capacity assessment;
    • Institutional strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats;
    • Political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental analysis;
    • Mapping fiscal, donor and investment trends;
    • Developing realistic resource mobilisation targets;
    • Diversifying the funding portfolio;
    • Short-, medium- and long-term mobilisation options;
    • Clarifying roles between leadership, finance, planning, technical and partnership units;
    • Establishing a resource mobilisation coordinating mechanism;
    • Preparing an institutional resource mobilisation strategy;
    • Linking the strategy to the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework and annual budget;
    • Strategy approval, implementation and periodic review.

    Practical tools

    • Institutional resource mobilisation scorecard;
    • Funding-gap template;
    • Resource-source attractiveness matrix;
    • Resource dependency analysis;
    • SWOT and PESTLE templates;
    • Resource mobilisation strategy template.

    Case scenario

    Case study: Uganda PPDA’s diversified strategic resource base Uganda’s Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority provides a directly relevant example. Its strategic plan identifies: • Government funding; • Development-partner technical and financial support; • Revenue from registration of new providers; • Revenue from renewal of provider registrations; and • Partnerships with other stakeholders. The plan records provider-registration revenue of UGX 1.01 billion in FY2020/21 and UGX 1.2 billion in FY2021/22. The revenue was transferred to the Consolidated Fund. This case demonstrates that own-source revenue does not automatically mean that the authority may retain and spend it. Retention and utilisation depend on the applicable public-finance law.

    Group exercise

    Case scenario

    Participants assess a hypothetical ministry with ambitious programmes but a 40% funding gap. They identify quick wins, medium-term reforms and strategic investments.

    A draft resource mobilisation strategic framework covering

    • Strategic objectives;
    • Priority funding requirements;
    • Potential sources;
    • responsible units;
    • Timelines;
    • Targets;
    • Risks; and
    • Performance indicators.
  3. 03Mobilising Non-Tax Revenue and Optimising Public Assets34 topics · includes a case scenario

    To help ministries, agencies and local authorities identify sustainable non-tax revenue without undermining access to essential public services.

    • Categories of non-tax revenue;
    • Administrative fees, licences, permits and service charges;
    • Royalties, rents, dividends and concessions;
    • Fines and penalties;
    • Revenue from natural resources;
    • Public land and property income;
    • State-owned enterprise dividends;
    • User charges and cost recovery;
    • Pricing public services;
    • Differentiating commercial, regulatory and social services;
    • Protecting vulnerable service users;
    • Inventorying and valuing public assets;
    • Underutilised and idle public assets;
    • Leasing, concessions, co-location and commercial use;
    • Government intellectual property and public data;
    • Naming rights, advertising and sponsorship;
    • Digital payment and revenue collection;
    • Preventing cash leakage and unofficial charges;
    • Reviewing outdated fees and tariffs;
    • Ring-fencing and revenue retention arrangements;
    • Legal and ethical limits on commercialisation;
    • Revenue reconciliation, reporting and audit.

    Case scenario

    Case Study: New Zealand’s Government Procurement Reform Financing Model New Zealand financed the initial development of its All-of-Government procurement programme through repayable capital injections. An administration fee equivalent to 1.5% of participating agencies’ expenditure was used to repay the capital invested in the programme. The mechanism enabled the government to finance procurement reform upfront and repay the investment from utilisation of the resulting contracts.

    By June 2013

    • All-of-Government contracts had generated approximately NZ$75.4 million in accumulated savings;
    • Agencies realised NZ$41.7 million in savings in the 2012/13 financial year; and
    • The administration fee supported repayment of capital advanced for the programme.

    Resource mobilisation mechanism

    • Upfront repayable public investment;
    • Administration fee based on framework utilisation;
    • Collective purchasing;
    • Savings-financed repayment.

    This is a useful model for financing

    • E-procurement systems;
    • Electronic catalogues;
    • Framework-agreement units;
    • Procurement analytics platforms; and
    • Central supplier-management systems.

    Case scenario

    The authority must disclose the fee, measure savings independently and review the charge once the original investment has been recovered. Practical exercise Each participant identifies five underused assets or non-tax revenue opportunities within their institution and evaluates them against: • Legal authority; • Revenue potential; • Collection cost; • Equity implications; • Political feasibility; • Implementation period; and • Leakage risk.

  4. 04Expenditure Efficiency as a Resource Mobilisation Strategy54 topics · includes a case scenario

    To demonstrate that resources can be created by reducing waste, leakage and low-value expenditure, not only by raising new revenue.

    • The relationship between mobilisation and expenditure management;
    • Spending reviews;
    • Value-for-money analysis;
    • Public expenditure tracking;
    • Programme-based budgeting;
    • Linking expenditure to results;
    • Payroll controls and ghost-worker elimination;
    • Procurement savings;
    • Framework agreements and strategic sourcing;
    • Contract management;
    • Preventing cost overruns;
    • Reducing duplication across government;
    • Shared services;
    • Energy and utility savings;
    • Digitalisation and process automation;
    • Managing arrears;
    • Subsidy targeting;
    • Identifying low-priority and ineffective programmes;
    • Reallocating savings to strategic priorities;
    • Measuring cashable and non-cashable savings;
    • Safeguarding service quality during expenditure reductions.

    Resource mobilisation mechanism

    • Central electronic marketplace;
    • Online auctions;
    • Wider bidder participation;
    • Digital audit trails;
    • Competitive price discovery.

    An e-auction system can

    • Increase disposal proceeds;
    • Reduce opportunities for collusion;
    • Standardise disposal procedures;
    • Produce national disposal data; and
    • Lower auction-administration costs.

    Case scenario

    The platform must still provide for physical inspection, independent valuation and secure payment.

    Case Study 2: Uganda’s Public Asset Disposal Mandate

    • Vehicles;
    • Machinery;
    • ICT equipment;
    • Furniture;
    • Scrap material;
    • Surplus stock; and
    • Other obsolete or unserviceable assets.

    Resource mobilisation mechanism

    • Competitive public auctions;
    • Electronic auctions;
    • Transfer between public institutions;
    • Sale of recyclable material;
    • Proper valuation and reserve prices.

    Public bodies frequently lose revenue because

    • Asset registers are incomplete;
    • Disposal is delayed until assets have little value;
    • Assets are undervalued;
    • Employees receive preferential access;
    • Auctions are insufficiently advertised; and
    • Disposal proceeds are not reconciled.

    Case scenario

    A procurement regulatory authority can develop national disposal standards and a shared e-auction platform. Practical exercise Participants conduct a rapid spending review of a sample public agency and identify: • Waste; • Duplication; • Inefficient processes; • Procurement savings; • Assets that can be redeployed; and • Funds that can be reallocated.

    New Zealand Government Procurement manages collaborative contracts for

    Case scenario

    The contracts use the combined purchasing power of government to: • Negotiate lower prices; • Standardise commercial terms; • Reduce repetitive tendering; • Improve supplier management; and • Reduce administrative costs.

    Resource mobilisation mechanism

    Case scenario

    The initiative does not raise revenue directly. It creates fiscal space by releasing funds that would otherwise have been spent on procurement.

    Lessons

    • Properly calculated;
    • Verified;
    • Cashable or budget-releasing;
    • Attributable to procurement action; and
    • Available for reallocation to priority services.
  5. 05Development Partner Funding, Grants and Concessional Finance37 topics · includes a case scenario

    To strengthen participants’ ability to identify, secure and manage external public-development finance.

    • The changing aid and development-finance landscape;
    • Bilateral and multilateral development partners;
    • Grants, concessional loans, technical assistance and blended facilities;
    • Restricted versus unrestricted financing;
    • Country strategies and funding windows;
    • Understanding donor priorities and funding cycles;
    • Donor intelligence and opportunity scanning;
    • Building a funding-opportunity database;
    • Partner eligibility and compliance requirements;
    • Preparing expressions of interest;
    • Developing concept notes and proposals;
    • Results frameworks and theories of change;
    • Developing realistic budgets;
    • Demonstrating value for money;
    • Co-financing and counterpart-funding requirements;
    • Fiduciary, environmental and social safeguards;
    • Negotiating financing agreements;
    • Donor coordination and avoiding fragmented projects;
    • Absorption capacity;
    • Reporting, evaluation and grant close-out;
    • Transitioning from donor dependency to sustainability.

    Case Study 1: Rwanda’s UMUCYO E-Procurement System

    Case scenario

    The development of the system was supported within broader governance and public financial management reform partnerships.

    Resources mobilised

    • Technical expertise;
    • System-development assistance;
    • Training;
    • Change-management support;
    • Procurement-system assessments; and
    • Support for continuous improvement.

    Lessons

    Case scenario

    A procurement authority seeking partner funding should present e- procurement as more than an ICT project. Its proposal should demonstrate: • Fiscal savings; • Transparency; • Improved competition; • Better procurement data; • Faster processes; • Reduced corruption exposure; and • Stronger development-partner confidence. Practical exercise Participants analyse a donor call and prepare a two-page concept note containing: • Problem statement; • Proposed intervention; • Target beneficiaries; • Expected results; • Implementation arrangements; • Sustainability; • Indicative budget; and • Funding request.

    Development-partner-supported public financial management programmes

    • System-development support;
    • Onboarding of procuring entities;
    • Training;
    • Implementation monitoring;
    • Institutional-capacity development; and
    • Integration with other public financial management reforms.

    Case scenario

    A World Bank programme reported that all planned procurement activities at its participating entities were conducted through GHANEPS.

    Lessons

    • Development-partner funding should be aligned with one government- owned roadmap.
    • Separate partners should not finance incompatible procurement systems.
    • The government must budget for hosting, cybersecurity, support and future upgrades.
    • Mandatory-use directives must be accompanied by user support and supplier onboarding.
  6. 06Project Preparation, Developing Bankable Public Projects and Mobilizing Private Capital62 topics · includes a case scenario

    To help institutions transform policy priorities into projects that governments, donors, development banks and investors can finance.

    • Difference between a policy idea, programme and bankable project;
    • Project identification and screening;
    • Strategic relevance;
    • Problem and options analysis;
    • Demand and needs assessment;
    • Technical feasibility;
    • Economic and financial appraisal;
    • Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis;
    • Affordability analysis;
    • Revenue models;
    • Life-cycle costing;
    • Environmental and social assessment;
    • Gender and inclusion;
    • Climate-risk assessment;
    • Land and resettlement considerations;
    • Institutional and implementation capacity;
    • Procurement strategy;
    • Legal and regulatory readiness;
    • Financial modelling;
    • Funding and financing structures;
    • Project preparation facilities;
    • Investor-ready documentation;
    • Establishing and managing a project pipeline;
    • Gateway reviews and project prioritisation;
    • Avoiding politically attractive but financially unviable projects.
    • Why governments use PPPs;
    • PPP as a private sector financial mobilization tool

    Case scenario

    Practical exercise Teams evaluate three proposed public projects using a project-readiness scorecard and decide which should be: • Advanced immediately; • Sent for further preparation; • Redesigned; or • Rejected.

    Institutional output

    Case scenario

    A one-page project investment profile suitable for initial engagement with financiers.

    Facility

    Case scenario

    The Philippines established the Project Development and Monitoring Facility to finance preparation of viable public-private partnership projects.

    It supports activities such as

    • Feasibility studies;
    • Transaction advisory services;
    • Financial modelling;
    • Legal structuring;
    • Project documentation; and
    • Procurement support.

    Resource mobilisation mechanism

    • Public project-preparation funding;
    • Development-partner support;
    • Recovery of project-development costs;
    • Revolving-fund approach.

    Procurement authorities could support a similar facility for

    • Complex infrastructure procurement;
    • PPP preparation;
    • Strategic sourcing initiatives;
    • Feasibility studies;
    • Market sounding; and
    • Specialist transaction advice.

    Case scenario

    The facility should have strict project-screening criteria to prevent expenditure on politically favoured but unviable projects.

    Producer Procurement Programme

    Case scenario

    The programme used competitive procurement to mobilise private investment for renewable-energy generation.

    Its procurement design included

    • Standardised procurement documentation;
    • Clearly defined qualification requirements;
    • Competitive price bidding;
    • Long-term power-purchase arrangements;
    • Bid windows;
    • Independent evaluation;
    • Developmental requirements; and
    • Defined government responsibilities.

    Resource mobilisation mechanism

    • Private equity;
    • Commercial debt;
    • Development-finance participation;
    • Competitive concessions;
    • Long-term purchase commitments.

    Lessons

    Case scenario

    The programme shows that private capital is mobilised through credible procurement architecture—not merely through investor promotion.

    Key requirements include

    • Policy certainty;
    • A credible procuring institution;
    • Bankable contracts;
    • Transparent evaluation;
    • Predictable procurement timelines; and
    • Appropriate risk allocation.
  7. 07Climate Finance, Green Funds and Innovative Financing31 topics · includes a case scenario

    To prepare public institutions to access climate and sustainability-linked resources and apply appropriate innovative financing mechanisms.

    • Climate mitigation, adaptation and resilience;
    • Climate-finance architecture;
    • Green Climate Fund;
    • Global Environment Facility;
    • Adaptation Fund;
    • Climate Investment Funds;
    • Multilateral development banks;
    • Green, blue and sustainability bonds;
    • Sovereign and municipal bonds;
    • Diaspora bonds;
    • Social-impact and development-impact bonds;
    • Debt-for-climate and debt-for-nature arrangements;
    • Carbon markets and carbon credits;
    • Payment for ecosystem services;
    • Blended finance;
    • Guarantees and risk-sharing facilities;
    • Preparing climate rationales;
    • Climate additionality;
    • Measuring mitigation and adaptation results;
    • Gender-responsive climate finance;
    • Environmental integrity;
    • Avoiding greenwashing;
    • Debt sustainability and foreign-exchange risks;
    • Accreditation and institutional readiness.

    Case scenario

    Case Study: Rwanda Green Fund—FONERWA Rwanda established a national green financing mechanism to mobilise and coordinate resources for environmental and climate-resilient programmes. The fund has supported public and private projects through combinations of: • Grants; • Innovation finance; • Credit mechanisms; • Domestic resources; • International climate finance; and • Development-partner contributions.

    The authority could partner with a green fund to finance

    • Sustainable-procurement guidelines;
    • Green-product catalogues;
    • Life-cycle costing tools;
    • Training for procuring entities;
    • Green supplier development;
    • Environmental contract clauses; and
    • Monitoring of procurement-related emissions.

    Lesson

    Case scenario

    Practical exercise Participants develop a climate-finance concept for a public project and identify: • Climate problem; • Eligible activities; • Financing instrument; • Potential funder; • Co-financing; • Climate results; • Safeguards; and • Sustainability arrangements.

  8. 09Stakeholder Engagement, Proposal Development and Strategic Communication50 topics · includes a case scenario

    To build participants’ ability to communicate public priorities persuasively and build durable financing relationships.

    • Stakeholder identification and segmentation;
    • Mapping interest, influence and resource potential;
    • Government-wide coordination;
    • Relationship management with donors and investors;
    • Engaging citizens and taxpayers;
    • Communicating the public value proposition;
    • Developing a compelling case for support;
    • Evidence-based storytelling;
    • Writing problem statements;
    • Demonstrating urgency without exaggeration;
    • Defining measurable results;
    • Proposal structure and quality standards;
    • Executive summaries;
    • Pitch decks and investment memoranda;
    • Funding requests and negotiation positions;
    • Preparing for donor and investor meetings;
    • Managing political and institutional messaging;
    • Communication during unsuccessful bids;
    • Maintaining a partner relationship database;
    • Reporting results to retain partner confidence.

    These include

    • Digital procurement information;
    • Supplier guidance;
    • Training;
    • Procurement support centres;
    • Standard procurement tools; and
    • Market-access initiatives.

    Resources mobilised

    • Partnerships with public institutions;
    • Digital training infrastructure;
    • Expertise from business-development organisations;
    • Supplier participation;
    • Public procurement data.

    Lessons

    Case scenario

    A procurement authority can mobilise non-financial resources by partnering with: • Universities; • Chambers of commerce; • Professional bodies; • SME agencies; • Banks; • Civil society; and • Technology institutions. Not every resource mobilisation strategy must generate cash directly.

    Practical activities

    • Three-minute project pitch;
    • Donor-meeting role play;
    • Proposal peer review;
    • Development of a stakeholder engagement plan.

    Kenya’s AGPO programme seeks to expand public procurement participation

    • Women-owned enterprises;
    • Youth-owned enterprises; and
    • Enterprises owned by persons with disabilities.

    Resource mobilisation strategy

    Case scenario

    The programme mobilises the government procurement market as an economic-development resource rather than creating a separate grant programme.

    Public procurement can provide targeted groups with

    • Market access;
    • Revenue opportunities;
    • Business experience;
    • Performance records;
    • Improved bankability; and
    • Opportunities for expansion.

    However, registration and reservation policies must be supported by

    • Supplier development;
    • Access to finance;
    • Prompt payment;
    • Proportionate tender requirements;
    • Prevention of fronting; and
    • Monitoring of actual contract value awarded and paid.
  9. 10Governance, Accountability, Ethics and Risk Management35 topics · includes a case scenario

    To ensure that resources are mobilised and managed transparently, legally and in the public interest.

    • Governance principles for resource mobilisation;
    • Public accountability and fiduciary responsibility;
    • Legal mandates and delegated authority;
    • Parliamentary and public oversight;
    • Public procurement integrity;
    • Conflict-of-interest management;
    • Anti-corruption controls;
    • Beneficial ownership transparency;
    • Managing illicit financial flows;
    • Donor and investor due diligence;
    • Financial controls and audit trails;
    • Fraud-risk assessment;
    • Safeguarding grant and project funds;
    • Transparency in concessions and PPPs;
    • Public disclosure;
    • Grievance and complaints mechanisms;
    • Environmental and social safeguards;
    • Reputational risk;
    • Foreign-exchange and refinancing risk;
    • Political and regulatory risk;
    • Contingent liabilities;
    • Cybersecurity and data-protection risks;
    • Developing a resource mobilisation risk register;
    • Crisis response and corrective action.

    Case scenario

    Practical exercise Teams prepare a risk register containing: • Risk description; • Probability; • Impact; • Risk owner; • Preventive controls; • Contingency action; and • Early-warning indicator. Case Study: Ukraine’s ProZorro E-Procurement System ProZorro was developed through collaboration between government, civil society, businesses and international partners. Its “everyone sees everything” principle supports public access to procurement information.

    Resources mobilised

    • Civil-society technical expertise;
    • Private-sector technology support;
    • Development-partner assistance;
    • Government ownership;
    • Open-source technology;
    • Public procurement data.

    Lessons

    • Partnership can reduce the initial burden on government.
    • Long-term ownership must ultimately be institutionalised.
    • Open data allows citizens and analysts to supplement regulatory oversight.
    • Civil-society monitoring can expand the effective oversight capacity of a procurement authority.
    • Open data does not replace formal audit and enforcement.
  10. 11Implementation, Monitoring and Institutional Action Planning53 topics · includes a case scenario

    To translate the programme into measurable organisational action.

    • Moving from strategy to implementation;
    • Prioritising mobilisation initiatives;
    • Quick wins versus structural reforms;
    • Developing annual mobilisation workplans;
    • Assigning accountability;
    • Mobilisation targets and milestones;
    • Input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators;
    • Leading and lagging indicators;
    • Measuring funds pledged, committed, received and utilised;
    • Monitoring proposal conversion rates;
    • Measuring revenue collection efficiency;
    • Tracking partner engagement;
    • Monitoring project-preparation progress;
    • Evaluating cost of mobilisation;
    • Portfolio diversification indicators;
    • Reporting to leadership and oversight bodies;
    • Resource mobilisation dashboards;
    • Quarterly performance reviews;
    • Adaptive management;
    • Capturing lessons learned;
    • Institutionalising systems, skills and relationships;
    • Succession planning and knowledge management.

    Suggested performance indicators

    • Increase in domestic revenue;
    • Increase in non-tax revenue;
    • Reduction in revenue leakage;
    • Value of grants secured;
    • Value of private capital mobilised;
    • Number and value of bankable projects;
    • Proposal success rate;
    • Average time taken to develop and approve a proposal;
    • Percentage of mobilised resources disbursed;
    • Resource absorption rate;
    • Number of active strategic partners;
    • Funding-source concentration;
    • Cost of mobilisation as a proportion of funds secured;
    • Percentage of funded projects delivering expected results;
    • Compliance and audit performance; and
    • Citizen or partner confidence levels.

    Case scenario

    Case Study: New Zealand’s Standard Procurement Savings Methodology New Zealand Government Procurement developed standard methodologies for calculating savings under All-of-Government contracts.

    Methodological elements

    • Defined price baseline;
    • Comparison of pre-contract and framework prices;
    • Consideration of volume changes;
    • Separation of price savings from process efficiencies;
    • Consistent reporting across contract categories; and
    • Periodic review of assumptions.

    Lessons

    Case scenario

    A procurement authority’s resource mobilisation dashboard should distinguish: • Budget savings; • Price reductions; • Cost avoidance; • Process savings; • Revenue generated; • Asset-disposal proceeds; • External funding mobilised; and • Private capital leveraged.

    To ensure implementation, the training may be followed by

    • Institutional resource mobilisation clinics;
    • Coaching for selected mobilisation teams;
    • Review of draft strategies and proposals;
    • Project-preparation support;
    • Donor and investor mapping;
    • Quarterly implementation reviews;
    • Development of a funding-opportunity database;
    • Establishment of an institutional resource mobilisation committee; and
    • Annual updating of the resource mobilisation strategy.

Training methodology

The programme will apply a practical, adult-learning approach combining:

  • Short expert presentations;
  • Facilitated discussions;
  • African public-sector case studies;
  • Institutional self-assessment;
  • Group problem-solving exercises;
  • Stakeholder-mapping exercises;
  • Funding-source mapping;
  • Revenue-gap analysis;
  • Project prioritisation;
  • Proposal and concept-note development;
  • Public-private partnership simulations;
  • Negotiation and donor-engagement role plays;
  • Risk identification and mitigation exercises;
  • Peer review and feedback;
  • Resource mobilisation clinics; and
  • Development of an institutional action plan.

Upcoming dates

In-house training

Run this programme for your team

We can deliver PKM348 at your premises, anywhere in Africa, with content aligned to your organisation's internal policies.

Questions about our courses

All frequently asked questions

How do I register for a course?

Choose a programme and date, then send an enquiry from the course page — the course and dates are filled in for you. Our team replies with the programme information and registration forms. You can also contact us on WhatsApp at +27 73 708 3507.

Do you offer in-house training at our premises?

Yes. Our group booking option allows us to bring our expert facilitators to your location anywhere in Africa. We can also customise the course content to align with your organisation’s internal policies.

How does pricing work for group bookings?

Pricing depends on your organisation's requirements, so we don't publish it. Please contact us with your programme, group size and preferred dates, and we'll get back to you with the details.

What payment methods do you accept?

We accept electronic funds transfers (EFT), direct bank deposits, and corporate or government purchase orders.

Do online delegates receive certificates?

Yes. Upon successful completion of a virtual course or programme, delegates receive a digital certificate of completion equivalent to our classroom-based training.

Ready to enrol your team?

Enquire about PKM348 and we'll send programme and registration information.